Mats Rosenkranz vs Anirudh Chandrasekar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rosenkranz vs A. Chandrasekar

Mats Rosenkranz

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

259

C. Rank

259

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$4.8K

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Anirudh Chandrasekar

IND

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'4" (193 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

259

C. Rank

259

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$4.8K

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Rosenkranz 1 - 0 Chandrasekar

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mats Rosenkranz winning 2 and Anirudh Chandrasekar winning 0. The last match between Mats Rosenkranz and Anirudh Chandrasekar was at the Kuwait F2 (Meshref), 06-11-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 6-0 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Rosenkranz	1
Chandrasekar	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Kuwait F2 (Meshref)(11-06-17)

Stats

Mats Rosenkranz

Anirudh Chandrasekar

M. Rosenkranz vs A. Chandrasekar H2H Profile

M. Rosenkranz	Stats	A. Chandrasekar
$4,755	Career Prize Money	$0
51.74% (327-305)	Career Total W/L	42.46% (76-103)
1	Hard	0
9	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Rosenkranz vs A. Chandrasekar Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mats Rosenkranz has won 45.70% of points on their second serve, while Anirudh Chandrasekar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mats Rosenkranz, in recent form, has won 42.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anirudh Chandrasekar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.59% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mats Rosenkranz has saved 53.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anirudh Chandrasekar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mats Rosenkranz has won 60.00% of matches played (W/L 51/34), with Anirudh Chandrasekar winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mats Rosenkranz has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 66/82). Anirudh Chandrasekar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 40/51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
Player level: In the last year, Mats Rosenkranz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.39% of matches (W/L 31/26), where as Anirudh Chandrasekar has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mats Rosenkranz winning 1 times and Anirudh Chandrasekar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mats Rosenkranz winning 2 and Anirudh Chandrasekar winning 0.
The last match between Mats Rosenkranz and Anirudh Chandrasekar was at the Kuwait F2 (Meshref), 06-11-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 6-0 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mats Rosenkranz has played against opponents with an average rank of 391.07 while Anirudh Chandrasekar has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mats Rosenkranz has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anirudh Chandrasekar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mats Rosenkranz has converted 24.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anirudh Chandrasekar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mats Rosenkranz vs Anirudh Chandrasekar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Rosenkranz vs A. Chandrasekar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Rosenkranz	Stats	A. Chandrasekar
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	5
5	Aces (Total)	2
6	Total Double Faults	5
1:33:0	Average Match Time	1:33:0
62% (37/60)	1st Serve %	61% (37/61)
81% (30/37)	1st Serve Win %	54% (20/37)
35% (8/23)	2nd Serve Win %	33% (8/24)
60% (6/10)	Break Pts Won %	50% (2/4)
54% (33/61)	Return Points Win %	37% (22/60)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Champaign Challenger - 10-11-2025
QF Murphy CassoneM. Cassone	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
R2 Adhithya GanesanA. Ganesan	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R1 Pablo Martinez GomezP. Martinez	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Inaki Montes-De La TorreI. Montes-De	L	6-1 2-0 ret.	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 27-10-2025
SF Martin DammM. Damm	L	7-6(3) 6-4	Stats

View All

A. Chandrasekar Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Orleans Challenger - 23-09-2024
Q1 Tristan LamasineT. Lamasine	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 16-10-2023
Q1 Kyrian JacquetK. Jacquet	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Quimper Challenger - 23-01-2023
Q1 Evan FurnessE. Furness	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
Nonthaburi 3 Challenger - 16-01-2023
Q1 Federico GaioF. Gaio	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 07-11-2022
Q1 Tristan MccormickT. Mccormick	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Rosenkranz vs A. Chandrasekar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Rosenkranz	Stats	A. Chandrasekar
51.74% (327/305)	YTD Win/Loss	42.46% (76/103)
50.62% (736/718)	Sets Win/Loss	43.37% (170/222)
50.85% (7201/6959)	Games Win/Loss	47.73% (1710/1873)
44.59% (66/82)	Hard Win/Loss	43.96% (40/51)
49.12% (112/116)	Clay Win/Loss	43.37% (36/47)
58.09% (140/101)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/5)
60.00% (9/6)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.59	Aces Per Game	0.17
4054	Aces Total	303
0.29	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
2015	Total Double Faults	352
1:24:31	Average Match Time	1st Match
466.57	Average Opponent Rank	143.11
60% (22439/37328)	1st Serve %	62% (3973/6413)
75% (16729/22439)	1st Serve Win %	65% (2569/3973)
48% (7168/14889)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1164/2440)
39% (1236/3190)	Break Points Won % (Total)	38% (194/514)
37% (13970/37897)	Return Points Win %	36% (2214/6217)
16.67% (1/5)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
47.37% (90/100)	Challenger W/L	21.43% (3/11)
54.13% (236/200)	Futures W/L	44.24% (73/92)
52% (320/621)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	42% (75/178)
100% (2/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
49% (116/238)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (17/34)
56% (111/198)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (16/35)
85% (318/270)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (81/67)
15% (318/48)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (81/14)
18% (313/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (98/9)